Why choose polystyrene heat exchangers? |
Polystyrene plate heat exchangers: simple, smart and built to last 💨
Not every ventilation system needs to transfer moisture or rely on complex membranes. Sometimes, simplicity is the smartest choice — especially when you’re looking for dry, reliable, and cost-effective heat recovery.
These heat exchangers are built from durable polystyrene plates arranged to separate the supply and exhaust air streams. As air moves through the exchanger, heat transfers across the plastic surfaces — with no contact between airstreams, no moisture exchange, and no risk of contamination. Just clean, efficient recovery of sensible heat (temperature only).
How does it work?
Polystyrene plate heat exchangers operate on the principle of sensible heat conduction. Inside the exchanger, parallel polystyrene plates form alternating channels for supply and exhaust air. These plates act as thermal barriers, allowing heat to transfer from the warmer airflow to the colder one via direct conduction through the solid plastic wall, without any mixing of air or transfer of humidity.
The performance of the system depends on:
Thanks to the low thermal resistance of polystyrene and the optimized geometry, ZERN ENGINEERING exchangers achieve heat recovery efficiencies up to 90%, while maintaining full airstream separation — a critical factor for air hygiene and system safety.
Where do they work best?
🏢 Small offices and meeting rooms
🏠 Apartments and private homes
🏫 Schools, kindergartens, libraries
🏪 Retail stores and customer zones
❄️ Any building in a dry or cold climate
Polystyrene heat exchangers are ideal for HRV (heat recovery ventilation) systems where humidity control isn’t required. They’re compact, reliable, and efficient — especially in regions with long heating seasons.
What’s the benefit in real numbers?
Let’s say we install a ZERN ENGINEERING polystyrene unit rated for 400 m³/h, running 12 hours per day all year round.
🌨️ In winter:
☀️ In summer:
🧾 Total yearly savings per unit: €340–400, with no serviceable parts and zero mechanical wear.
Why ZERN ENGINEERING?
Because we believe great ventilation should be:
💰 Cost-effective in the long run — real energy savings, year after year
🧼 Clean and safe — dry heat transfer without any risk of air mixing
🧩 Easy to install and replace — our units are sized to fit standard ventilation systems
🌍 Resilient — works in any climate, without corrosion or mold risks
Polystyrene plate heat exchangers don’t try to do everything — they focus on one thing and do it well: recovering heat, simply and dependably.
Enthalpy heat exchangers for your business |
Air-to-air enthalpy plate heat exchangers – smart ventilation with real savings♻️
• 🏢 Office ventilation systems
• 🏠 Residential energy recovery units
• 🏭 Industrial and process air recovery
• 🏫 Schools, libraries, and public buildings
• 🩺 Administrative areas in healthcare facilities*
*⚠️ Note: Enthalpy exchangers are suitable for general-use zones in hospitals (like lobbies or offices), but not for sterile spaces (ICUs, ORs), due to minimal but unavoidable air crossover.
So how much does it actually save?
Let’s take a realistic case — a ZERN ENGINEERING enthalpy unit handling 600 m³/h, running 12 hours a day, all year.
🌨️ Winter:
• Outdoor air: –5 °C → Indoor setpoint: +20 °C
• Recovery: up to 70% of heat from exhaust air
• Savings: ~10–12 kWh/day, totaling 1,500–1,800 kWh over the season
• ~€300–360 saved on heating
☀️ Summer:
• Outdoor air: +30 °C, 60% RH → Indoor setpoint: +22 °C, 45% RH
• Recovery: precooling + dehumidification (~4–5 kWh/day)
• Seasonal savings: ~500–600 kWh
• ~€100–120 off cooling and drying costs
🧾 Annual savings: €400–480 per unit, plus softer indoor climate and reduced HVAC wear.
Now apply that to a network of small retail spaces, classrooms, or hotel corridors — and you’re looking at thousands in savings, with zero moving parts to service.
Why ZERN ENGINEERING?
Our enthalpy plate heat exchangers aren’t just efficient — they’re engineered for real-life demands:
• 🔁 Dual energy recovery — both sensible and latent heat transfer in one compact unit
• 🧫 Antibacterial & mold-resistant membrane — does not support mold growth and blocks microorganisms
• 📐 Universal fit — standardized module sizes compatible with most ERV/HRV units
• 🔄 Easy retrofit and replacement — drop-in compatible with existing ventilation systems
• 🧱 Rigid, sealed frame construction — ensures high air tightness and minimal leakage
• 🛠️ No consumables, no moving parts — durable and low-maintenance
• 🌍 Built for harsh climates — works reliably in both cold and humid conditions
As energy prices rise and climate expectations grow, integrating heat and humidity recovery into your ventilation system isn’t a luxury — it’s common sense. If you’re designing smarter buildings, it starts with smarter air exchange.
Counter-flow or cross-flow heat exchangers? |
When it comes to air-to-air plate heat exchangers, the way air streams move makes a big difference. The two most common designs – counter-flow and cross-flow – each have their own strengths. Let’s break it down.
💨 Counter-flow heat exchangers
In a counter-flow design, the warm and cold air streams move in opposite directions, separated by thin conductive plates. This setup allows for maximum temperature difference and longer contact time between air streams.
✅ Advantages:
– High heat recovery efficiency (up to 90%)
– Excellent for cold climates or ultra-low-energy buildings
– Reduces heating/cooling loads significantly
🔧 Considerations:
– Slightly more complex construction
– Can take up more space in some installations
📌 Best suited for:
1. Passive houses
2. Energy-efficient residential systems
3. Applications where energy savings are a top priority
💨 Cross-flow heat exchangers
In a cross-flow setup, the two air streams move perpendicularly to each other. While the temperature exchange is slightly less efficient, the design is compact, simple and cost-effective.
✅ Advantages:
– Compact and easy to install
– Lower manufacturing cost
– Good airflow performance with low pressure drop
🔧 Considerations:
– Lower heat recovery efficiency (typically 60-80%)
– May require airflow balancing in sensitive systems
📌 Best suited for:
1. Commercial and office buildings
2. Retrofitted ventilation systems
3. Projects with limited space or tighter budgets
So… Which one is better?🤔
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer- and that’s the beauty of it.
Both counter-flow and cross-flow heat exchangers are valuable tools in designing efficient, comfortable, and sustainable ventilation systems.
👉 Choose counter-flow for maximum energy savings.
👉 Choose cross-flow for practicality, compactness and economy.
Both get the job done – just with a different approach☺️